Alkalinization
Analgesics..
Antiandrogens..
Bromhexine
Budesonide
Cannabidiol
Colchicine
Conv. Plasma
Curcumin
Ensovibep
Famotidine
Favipiravir
Fluvoxamine
Hydroxychlor..
Iota-carragee..
Ivermectin
Lactoferrin
Lifestyle..
Melatonin
Metformin
Molnupiravir
Monoclonals..
Nigella Sativa
Nitazoxanide
Nitric Oxide
Paxlovid
Peg.. Lambda
Povidone-Iod..
Quercetin
Remdesivir
Vitamins..
Zinc

Other
Feedback
Home
Home   COVID-19 treatment studies for Hydroxychloroquine  COVID-19 treatment studies for HCQ  C19 studies: HCQ  HCQ   Select treatmentSelect treatmentTreatmentsTreatments
Alkalinization Meta Lactoferrin Meta
Melatonin Meta
Bromhexine Meta Metformin Meta
Budesonide Meta Molnupiravir Meta
Cannabidiol Meta
Colchicine Meta Nigella Sativa Meta
Conv. Plasma Meta Nitazoxanide Meta
Curcumin Meta Nitric Oxide Meta
Ensovibep Meta Paxlovid Meta
Famotidine Meta Peg.. Lambda Meta
Favipiravir Meta Povidone-Iod.. Meta
Fluvoxamine Meta Quercetin Meta
Hydroxychlor.. Meta Remdesivir Meta
Iota-carragee.. Meta
Ivermectin Meta Zinc Meta

Other Treatments Global Adoption
All Studies   Meta Analysis   Recent:  
Hydroxychloroquine use against SARS-CoV-2 infection in non-human primates
Maisonnasse et al., Nature, 2020, doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2558-4 (date from earlier preprint)
Maisonnasse et al., Hydroxychloroquine use against SARS-CoV-2 infection in non-human primates, Nature, 2020, doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2558-4 (date from earlier preprint)
May 2020   Source   PDF  
  Twitter
  Facebook
Share
  All Studies   Meta
Monkey study which reports no effect of HCQ or HCQ+AZ. However, there are several signs of effectiveness despite the very small sample sizes and 100% recovery of all treated and control monkeys.
58% reduction in lung lesions: the final day lung lesion data shows 63% of control monkeys have lesions, while 26% of treated monkeys do, p=0.095 (the final day data is missing for 7 monkeys, these are predicted based on the day 5 results and the trend of comparable monkeys).
97% increase in viral load recovery after one week: 3 of 8 control monkeys (38%) have recovered with <= 4 log10 copies/mL viral load, compared to 17 of 23 treated monkeys (74%), p=0.095. 3 of 8 (38%) control monkeys also have a higher peak viral load than 100% of the 23 treated monkeys post-treatment. The group with the lowest peak viral load is the PrEP group.
All animals were infected with the same initial viral load, whereas real-world infections vary in the initial viral load, and lower inital viral loads allow greater time to mount an immune response.
Severity of disease is not analyzed as compared to humans. The steep viral drops observed could also be related to immune system response.
Maisonnasse et al., 6 May 2020, peer-reviewed, 24 authors.
All Studies   Meta Analysis   Submit Updates or Corrections
This PaperHCQAll
Abstract: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2558-4 Accelerated Article Preview W E I V E R P E L C I T R A D E T A R E L E C C A Hydroxychloroquine use against SARSCoV-2 infection in non-human primates Received: 30 April 2020 Accepted: 10 July 2020 Accelerated Article Preview Published online 22 July 2020 Cite this article as: Maisonnasse, P. et al. Hydroxychloroquine use against SARS-CoV-2 infection in non-human primates. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-020-2558-4 (2020). Pauline Maisonnasse, Jérémie Guedj, Vanessa Contreras, Sylvie Behillil, Caroline Solas, Romain Marlin, Thibaut Naninck, Andres Pizzorno, Julien Lemaitre, Antonio Gonçalves, Nidhal Kahlaoui, Olivier Terrier, Raphael Ho Tsong Fang, Vincent Enouf, Nathalie Dereuddre-Bosquet, Angela Brisebarre, Franck Touret, Catherine Chapon, Bruno Hoen, Bruno Lina, Manuel Rosa Calatrava, Sylvie van der Werf, Xavier de Lamballerie & Roger Le Grand This is a PDF file of a peer-reviewed paper that has been accepted for publication. Although unedited, the content has been subjected to preliminary formatting. Nature is providing this early version of the typeset paper as a service to our authors and readers. The text and figures will undergo copyediting and a proof review before the paper is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply. Nature | www.nature.com Article Hydroxychloroquine use against SARSCoV-2 infection in non-human primates W E I V E R P E L C I T R A D E T A R E L E C C A https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2558-4 Received: 30 April 2020 Accepted: 10 July 2020 Published online: 22 July 2020 Pauline Maisonnasse1,11, Jérémie Guedj2,11, Vanessa Contreras1,11, Sylvie Behillil3,4,11, Caroline Solas5,11, Romain Marlin1,11, Thibaut Naninck1, Andres Pizzorno6, Julien Lemaitre1, Antonio Gonçalves2, Nidhal Kahlaoui1, Olivier Terrier6, Raphael Ho Tsong Fang1, Vincent Enouf3,4,10, Nathalie Dereuddre-Bosquet1, Angela Brisebarre3,4, Franck Touret8, Catherine Chapon1, Bruno Hoen9, Bruno Lina6,7, Manuel Rosa Calatrava6, Sylvie van der Werf3,4, Xavier de Lamballerie8 & Roger Le Grand1 ✉ COVID-19 has rapidly become a pandemic for which no antiviral drug or vaccine is yet available2–4. Several clinical studies are ongoing to evaluate the efficacy of repurposed drugs that have demonstrated antiviral efficacy in vitro. Among these candidates, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been given to thousands of individuals worldwide but definitive evidence for HCQ efficacy in treatment of COVID-19 is still missing6,7,17,18. We evaluated the antiviral activity of HCQ both in vitro and in SARS-CoV-2-infected macaques. HCQ showed antiviral activity in African green monkey kidney cells (VeroE6) but not in a model of reconstituted human airway epithelium. In macaques, we tested different treatment strategies in comparison to placebo, before and after peak viral load, alone or in combination with azithromycin (AZTH). Neither HCQ nor HCQ+AZTH showed a significant effect on the viral load levels in any of the tested compartments. When the drug was used as a pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), HCQ did not confer protection against acquisition of infection. Our findings do not support the use of HCQ, either alone or in combination with AZTH, as an antiviral treatment for COVID-19 in humans. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is characterized by initial mild..
Loading..
Please send us corrections, updates, or comments. Vaccines and treatments are complementary. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used based on risk/benefit analysis. No treatment, vaccine, or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. We do not provide medical advice. Before taking any medication, consult a qualified physician who can provide personalized advice and details of risks and benefits based on your medical history and situation. FLCCC and WCH provide treatment protocols.
  or use drag and drop   
Submit