Analgesics
Antiandrogens
Azvudine
Bromhexine
Budesonide
Colchicine
Conv. Plasma
Curcumin
Famotidine
Favipiravir
Fluvoxamine
Hydroxychlor..
Ivermectin
Lifestyle
Melatonin
Metformin
Minerals
Molnupiravir
Monoclonals
Naso/orophar..
Nigella Sativa
Nitazoxanide
Paxlovid
Quercetin
Remdesivir
Thermotherapy
Vitamins
More

Other
Feedback
Home
Top
Results
Abstract
All HCQ studies
Meta analysis
 
Feedback
Home
next
study
previous
study
c19hcq.org COVID-19 treatment researchHCQHCQ (more..)
Melatonin Meta
Metformin Meta
Azvudine Meta
Bromhexine Meta Molnupiravir Meta
Budesonide Meta
Colchicine Meta
Conv. Plasma Meta Nigella Sativa Meta
Curcumin Meta Nitazoxanide Meta
Famotidine Meta Paxlovid Meta
Favipiravir Meta Quercetin Meta
Fluvoxamine Meta Remdesivir Meta
Hydroxychlor.. Meta Thermotherapy Meta
Ivermectin Meta

All Studies   Meta Analysis    Recent:   
0 0.5 1 1.5 2+ Progression -196% Improvement Relative Risk Hospitalization 52% Case 14% Case (b) 6% HCQ for COVID-19  HOPE  Prophylaxis  RCT Is pre-exposure prophylaxis with HCQ beneficial for COVID-19? RCT 414 patients in India (June 2020 - February 2021) Trial underpowered to detect differences c19hcq.org Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan et al., BMJ.., Jun 2022 Favors HCQ Favors control

Hydroxychloroquine plus personal protective equipment versus personal protective equipment alone for the prevention of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infections among healthcare workers: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised controlled trial from India

Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan et al., BMJ Open, doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059540, HOPE, CTRI/2020/05/025067
Jun 2022  
  Post
  Facebook
Share
  Source   PDF   All   Meta
HCQ for COVID-19
1st treatment shown to reduce risk in March 2020
 
*, now known with p < 0.00000000001 from 422 studies, recognized in 42 countries.
No treatment is 100% effective. Protocols combine complementary and synergistic treatments. * >10% efficacy in meta analysis with ≥3 clinical studies.
4,100+ studies for 60+ treatments. c19hcq.org
Low-dose prophylaxis RCT with low-risk healthcare workers in India, showing no significant differences. Symptomatic case results are not provided. Followup was over 6 months, however treatment ended after 3 months. 21% of patients discontinued treatment before 3 months (Table S2).
risk of progression, 196.2% higher, RR 2.96, p = 1.00, treatment 1 of 211 (0.5%), control 0 of 203 (0.0%), continuity correction due to zero event (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), ICU/HDU.
risk of hospitalization, 51.9% lower, RR 0.48, p = 0.62, treatment 1 of 211 (0.5%), control 2 of 203 (1.0%), NNT 196.
risk of case, 14.2% lower, RR 0.86, p = 0.73, treatment 11 of 211 (5.2%), control 12 of 203 (5.9%), NNT 143, adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk, confirmed cases, multivariable.
risk of case, 5.7% lower, RR 0.94, p = 0.90, treatment 12 of 211 (5.7%), control 12 of 203 (5.9%), NNT 446, adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk, multivariable.
Effect extraction follows pre-specified rules prioritizing more serious outcomes. Submit updates
Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan et al., 1 Jun 2022, Randomized Controlled Trial, India, peer-reviewed, mean age 32.1, 21 authors, study period 29 June, 2020 - 4 February, 2021, trial CTRI/2020/05/025067 (HOPE). Contact: bharathkumartv@gmail.com.
This PaperHCQAll
Hydroxychloroquine plus personal protective equipment versus personal protective equipment alone for the prevention of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infections among healthcare workers: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised controlled trial from India
Bharath Kumar Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan, Vivekanand Jha, Dorrilyn Rajbhandari, Sheila Nainan Myatra, Arpita Ghosh, Amritendu Bhattacharya, Sumaiya Arfin, Abhinav Bassi, Lachlan Hugh Donaldson, Naomi E Hammond, Oommen John, Rohina Joshi, Mallikarjuna Kunigari, Cynthia Amrutha, Syed Haider Mehdi Husaini, Subir Ghosh, Santosh Kumar Nag, Hari Krishnan Selvaraj, Viny Kantroo, Kamal D Shah, Balasubramanian Venkatesh
BMJ Open, doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059540
Hydroxychloroquine plus personal protective equipment versus personal protective equipment alone for the prevention of laboratoryconfirmed COVID-19 infections among healthcare workers: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised controlled trial from India. BMJ Open 2022;12:e059540.
Ethics approval This study involves human participants and was approved by The George Institute Ethics Committee (reference number: 08-2020). Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part. Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed. Data availability statement Data are available upon reasonable request. Deidentified patient data will be made available beginning 6 months after publication of the study and ending at 2 years. All requests for data sharing must be accompanied by a formal request, a study proposal with clear statement of aims and hypotheses and a statistical analysis plan. All applications will be assessed by the HOPE Management Committee. Applications from investigators with suitable academic capability to conduct the proposed work will be given consideration. Any proposal will require approval from the ethics committee which approved the conduct of this trial prior to sharing of any patient data. If a proposal is approved, a signed data transfer agreement will be required before data sharing. Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated..
References
Abella, Jolkovsky, Biney, Efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine vs placebo for pre-exposure SARS-CoV-2 prophylaxis among health care workers: a randomized clinical trial, JAMA Intern Med, doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.6319
Barnabas, Brown, Bershteyn, Hydroxychloroquine as postexposure prophylaxis to prevent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, Ann Intern Med, doi:10.7326/M20-6519
Boulware, Pullen, Bangdiwala, A randomized trial of hydroxychloroquine as postexposure prophylaxis for Covid-19, N Engl J Med Overseas Ed, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2016638
Daic, None
Dhibar, Arora, Kakkar, Post-exposure prophylaxis with hydroxychloroquine for the prevention of COVID-19, a myth or a reality? the PEP-CQ study, Int J Antimicrob Agents, doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106224
Dialysis, Amarneni, Kamal, Shah, Sankar et al., Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Critical Care, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital
Dialysis, Amarneni, Kamal, Shah, Sankar et al., of Pulmonary Medicine & Critical Care
Epicentro, None
Fda, None
Ghosh, Bhattacharya, Jha, Statistical analysis plan for the HydrOxychloroquine prophylaxis evaluation(HOPE) trial, doi:10.31219/osf.io/uw3ed
Gómez-Ochoa, Franco, Rojas, COVID-19 in healthcare workers: a living systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence, risk factors, clinical characteristics, and outcomes, Am J Epidemiol, doi:10.1093/aje/kwaa191
Ich, None
Liu, Cao, Xu, Hydroxychloroquine, a less toxic derivative of chloroquine, is effective in inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro, Cell Discov, doi:10.1038/s41421-020-0156-0
Mitjà, Corbacho-Monné, Ubals, A cluster-randomized trial of hydroxychloroquine for prevention of Covid-19, N Engl J Med, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2021801
Mohfw, None
Rajasingham, Bangdiwala, Nicol, Hydroxychloroquine as pre-exposure prophylaxis for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in healthcare workers: a randomized trial, Clin Infect Dis, doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa1571
Rojas-Serrano, Ireri, Vazquez-Perez, Vecham, Elvira et al., Hydroxychloroquine for prophylaxis of COVID-19 in health workers: a randomized clinical trial, doi:10.1101/2021.05.14.21257059
Ruiz, Concordet, Lanot, Hydroxychloroquine lung pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients with COVID-19, Int J Antimicrob Agents, doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106247
Seet, Quek, Ooi, Positive impact of oral hydroxychloroquine and povidone-iodine throat spray for COVID-19 prophylaxis: an open-label randomized trial, Int J Infect Dis, doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.035
Venkatesh (chair, Ghosh, John, Myatra, Joshi et al., Independent data monitoring and safety committee: Rinaldo Bellomo (chair), Jeyaraj Pandian, Niveditha Devasenapathy
Vijayaraghavan, Jha, Rajbhandari, Hydroxychloroquine plus personal protective equipment versus standard personal protective equipment alone for the prevention of COVID-19 infections among frontline healthcare workers: the HydrOxychloroquine Prophylaxis Evaluation(HOPE) trial: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial, Trials, doi:10.1186/s13063-020-04679-3
Vincent, Bergeron, Benjannet, Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread, Virol J, doi:10.1186/1743-422X-2-69
Who, None
Who, None
Who, None
Wma, None
Wu, Mcgoogan, Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease, JAMA, doi:10.1001/jama.2020.2648
Yeo, Zhang, Pan, Impact of disease on plasma and lung exposure of chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin: application of PBPK modeling, Clin Pharmacol Ther, doi:10.1002/cpt.1955
Loading..
Please send us corrections, updates, or comments. c19early involves the extraction of 100,000+ datapoints from thousands of papers. Community updates help ensure high accuracy. Treatments and other interventions are complementary. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used based on risk/benefit analysis. No treatment or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. We do not provide medical advice. Before taking any medication, consult a qualified physician who can provide personalized advice and details of risks and benefits based on your medical history and situation. FLCCC and WCH provide treatment protocols.
  or use drag and drop   
Submit