Alkalinization
Analgesics..
Antiandrogens..
Bromhexine
Budesonide
Cannabidiol
Colchicine
Conv. Plasma
Curcumin
Ensovibep
Famotidine
Favipiravir
Fluvoxamine
Hydroxychlor..
Iota-carragee..
Ivermectin
Lactoferrin
Lifestyle..
Melatonin
Metformin
Molnupiravir
Monoclonals..
Nigella Sativa
Nitazoxanide
Nitric Oxide
Paxlovid
Peg.. Lambda
Povidone-Iod..
Quercetin
Remdesivir
Vitamins..
Zinc

Other
Feedback
Home
Home   COVID-19 treatment studies for Hydroxychloroquine  COVID-19 treatment studies for HCQ  C19 studies: HCQ  HCQ   Select treatmentSelect treatmentTreatmentsTreatments
Alkalinization Meta Lactoferrin Meta
Melatonin Meta
Bromhexine Meta Metformin Meta
Budesonide Meta Molnupiravir Meta
Cannabidiol Meta
Colchicine Meta Nigella Sativa Meta
Conv. Plasma Meta Nitazoxanide Meta
Curcumin Meta Nitric Oxide Meta
Ensovibep Meta Paxlovid Meta
Famotidine Meta Peg.. Lambda Meta
Favipiravir Meta Povidone-Iod.. Meta
Fluvoxamine Meta Quercetin Meta
Hydroxychlor.. Meta Remdesivir Meta
Iota-carragee.. Meta
Ivermectin Meta Zinc Meta

Other Treatments Global Adoption
All Studies   Meta Analysis   Recent:  
0 0.5 1 1.5 2+ Virological cure at day 5 15% Improvement Relative Risk c19hcq.org Shabrawishi et al. HCQ for COVID-19 LATE TREATMENT Is late treatment with HCQ beneficial for COVID-19? Retrospective 93 patients in Saudi Arabia No significant difference in viral clearance Shabrawishi et al., medRxix, doi:10.1101/2020.05.08.20095679 Favors HCQ Favors control
Negative nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 PCR conversion in response to different therapeutic interventions
Shabrawishi et al., medRxix, doi:10.1101/2020.05.08.20095679 (Preprint)
Shabrawishi et al., Negative nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 PCR conversion in response to different therapeutic interventions, medRxix, doi:10.1101/2020.05.08.20095679 (Preprint)
May 2020   Source   PDF  
  Twitter
  Facebook
Share
  All Studies   Meta
Retrospective 93 hospitalized patients in Saudi Arabia showing a non-statistically significant 15% reduction in PCR positive results at day 5, RR 0.85, p = 0.65. The treatment group had significantly more severe illness and significantly more male patients.
Although the viral clearance result is not statistically significant, it is consistent with the significant 20% improved viral clearance [10‑29%] from meta analysis of the 42 viral clearance results to date.
risk of no virological cure at day 5, 14.7% lower, RR 0.85, p = 0.66, treatment 12 of 45 (26.7%), control 15 of 48 (31.2%), NNT 22.
Effect extraction follows pre-specified rules prioritizing more serious outcomes. Submit updates
Shabrawishi et al., 11 May 2020, retrospective, Saudi Arabia, preprint, mean age 43.9, 5 authors.
All Studies   Meta Analysis   Submit Updates or Corrections
This PaperHCQAll
Abstract: medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.08.20095679; this version posted May 11, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . Article title: Negative nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 PCR conversion in Response to different therapeutic interventions. Short-running title: Negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR conversion Authors’ information: Mohammed Hassan Shabrawishi1, Abdallah Y Naser2, Hassan Alwafi3, Ahmad Mansoor Aldobyany4, Abdelfattah Ahmed Touman4 1 Pulmonology department, Al Noor Specialist Hospital, Mecca, Saudi Arabia. 2 Faculty of Pharmacy, Isra University, Amman, Jordan. 3 Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Umm Alqura University, College of Medicine, Mecca, Saudi Arabia. 4 Pulmonology department, King Abdullah Medical City, Mecca, Saudi Arabia. Corresponding author: Abdelfattah Ahmed Touman, Pulmonology consultant Pulmonology department, King Abdullah Medical City, Mecca, Saudi Arabia Telephone: +966530059224 Email: (abdotouman@gmail.com) Take home message: Prescribing antimalarial medications for patients with COVID-19 was not shown to shorten the disease course nor to accelerate the negative PCR conversion rate. Number of words in abstract: 247 words Number of words in main body text: 2,962 words Number of tables in main body text: 3 table Number of figures in main body text: 1 figures Number of references in main body text: 23 1 NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice. medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.08.20095679; this version posted May 11, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . ABSTRACT (247) BACKGROUND: Despite lack of convincing evidence of the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine, it has been suggested to be used for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 to accelerate the negative virus conversion. We aimed to explore the association between negative nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 PCR clearance and different therapeutic interventions. METHODOLOGY: This was a retrospective cohort study of 93 patients who were admitted to medical ward with a PCR confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 and met the inclusion criteria in a tertiary hospital in Mecca, Saudi Arabia. There were three interventional subgroups (group A (n=45): who received antimalarial drug only classified as (A1), combined with azithromycin (A2) or combined with antiviral drugs (A3)), and one supportive care group (group B) (n=48). The primary and secondary endpoints of the study were achieving negative SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal PCR sample within five days or less from the start of the intervention and 12 days or less from the diagnose, respectively. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 43.9 years (SD:15.9). A median time of 3.00 days (IQR:2.00–6.50) needed from the time of starting the intervention/supportive care to the first negative PCR sample. There was no statistically significant difference neither between the percentage of patients in the interventional group and the supportive care group who achieved the primary or the secondary..
Late treatment
is less effective
Please send us corrections, updates, or comments. Vaccines and treatments are complementary. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used based on risk/benefit analysis. No treatment, vaccine, or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. We do not provide medical advice. Before taking any medication, consult a qualified physician who can provide personalized advice and details of risks and benefits based on your medical history and situation. FLCCC and WCH provide treatment protocols.
  or use drag and drop   
Submit