Analgesics
Antiandrogens
Antihistamines
Azvudine
Bromhexine
Budesonide
Colchicine
Conv. Plasma
Curcumin
Famotidine
Favipiravir
Fluvoxamine
Hydroxychlor..
Ivermectin
Lifestyle
Melatonin
Metformin
Minerals
Molnupiravir
Monoclonals
Naso/orophar..
Nigella Sativa
Nitazoxanide
PPIs
Paxlovid
Quercetin
Remdesivir
Thermotherapy
Vitamins
More

Other
Feedback
Home
 
next
study
previous
study
c19hcq.org COVID-19 treatment researchHCQHCQ (more..)
Melatonin Meta
Metformin Meta
Antihistamines Meta
Azvudine Meta Molnupiravir Meta
Bromhexine Meta
Budesonide Meta
Colchicine Meta Nigella Sativa Meta
Conv. Plasma Meta Nitazoxanide Meta
Curcumin Meta PPIs Meta
Famotidine Meta Paxlovid Meta
Favipiravir Meta Quercetin Meta
Fluvoxamine Meta Remdesivir Meta
Hydroxychlor.. Meta Thermotherapy Meta
Ivermectin Meta

All Studies   Meta Analysis       

Global COVID-19 Pandemic Outcomes: A Cross-Country Comparison Study of Policy Strategies

Thorp et al., Integrative Medicine, 23:2
May 2024  
  Post
  Facebook
Share
  Source   PDF   All Studies   Meta AnalysisMeta
HCQ for COVID-19
1st treatment shown to reduce risk in March 2020, now with p < 0.00000000001 from 419 studies, recognized in 46 countries.
No treatment is 100% effective. Protocols combine treatments.
5,100+ studies for 112 treatments. c19hcq.org
Retrospective study of 108 countries showing negative correlations between hydroxychloroquine/ivermectin use and mortality. Higher ivermectin index scores (r=-0.23, p=0.018) and hydroxychloroquine index scores (r=-0.15, p=0.125) were correlated with lower mortality. The study also found positive correlations between mortality and healthcare expenditure, income levels, testing rates, vaccination, and stringency of containment measures. Authors note limitations in data reliability and consistency across countries. The results challenge the efficacy of common pandemic management strategies and suggest potential benefits of early treatment with hydroxychloroquine/ivermectin.
Study covers ivermectin and HCQ.
Thorp et al., 31 May 2024, retrospective, peer-reviewed, 5 authors.
This PaperHCQAll
Abstract: This article is protected by copyright. To share or copy this article, please visit copyright.com. Use ISSN#1945-7081. To subscribe, visit imjournal.com REVIEW ARTICLE Global COVID-19 Pandemic Outcomes: A Cross-Country Comparison Study of Policy Strategies James A. Thorp, MD; Margery M. Thorp, JD, MACP; Elise M. Thorp, BS, FNTP; Ajovi Scott-Emuakpor, MD, PhD; K.E. Thorp, MD Abstract This paper explores global COVID-19 treatment and containment strategies in 108 countries worldwide, specifically the correlation between COVID-19 deaths and the countries’ vaccination rates. Comparison of data across states, provinces, territories, and countries relied upon a common method to evaluate data regarding the impact of COVID-19 policies in the last three years. Data from nine different databases were analyzed to determine if there were correlations between the percentage of countrywide COVID-19 deaths/ population and countries’ percent vaccinated. Secondary outcome measures include the effect of other variables on COVID-19 death rates per country population, including health expenditures and annual income per capita, COVID-19 tests per 1000 people, stringency index (a measure of each country’s containment strategies), hydroxychloroquine/ivermectin scores (measure country use), hypertension, obesity, diabetes, and geographic locations. COVID-19 vaccination rates James A Thorp, MD; Chief of Maternal and Pre-Natal Health, The Wellness Company, Gulf Breeze, FL. Margery M. Thorp, JD, MACP; Law Firm of Margery M. Thorp, PLLC, Gulf Breeze, FL. Elise M. Thorp, BS, FNTP; Williamston, MI. Ajovi Scott-Emuakpor, MD, PhD; Dept. of Pediatrics & Human Development, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI. K.E. Thorp, MD; Department of Radiology, Sparrow Health System, Lansing, MI. Corresponding author: James A. Thorp, MD E-mail address: jathorp@bellsouth.net
Loading..
Please send us corrections, updates, or comments. c19early involves the extraction of 100,000+ datapoints from thousands of papers. Community updates help ensure high accuracy. Treatments and other interventions are complementary. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used based on risk/benefit analysis. No treatment or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. We do not provide medical advice. Before taking any medication, consult a qualified physician who can provide personalized advice and details of risks and benefits based on your medical history and situation. FLCCC and WCH provide treatment protocols.
  or use drag and drop   
Submit